Re: test / backup server .... NAT question
- From: Sara Kirk <sarakirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:16:49 +0100
In article <J8CdnQweW4HgvfnZnZ2dnUVZ8t2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Luke
Siemaszko <no.spam.for.me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've had too many scary near misses installing new software on my 10.3.9
server. I really should have a test server for evaluating software
before puting it on the 'proper' one. Finding another machine and
configuring it the same as the main server is not a problem. However,
iif I've got such a machine, I may as well not just use it for test
purposes, but also as a backup server. ie if my main server goes 'bang'
i can quickly whip out the backup one and get going again with that
quickly. seems a good idea. Yes I know I need to get the user data
from 1 machine to the other, forget about that, that's a different issue.
I did something very similar, and when the sever went TU a couple of
weeks ago, I was very glad that I had. Unlike you however I kept the
back-up offline.
so that the clients don't get confused the backup server must have the
same IP address as the main server. I can't have 2 machines with the
same IP on the same network, so am I right in thinking that a NAT router
is what I want so that the backup machine appears to the rest of the
world as a different address?
Umm - dunno.
If I wanted to test connectivity I would just plug one the client
And if I need to go live with the backup[ machine, I just bypass the router.
Also, I will be installing the same copies of some software on both
machines. But some of them sniff out other copies of themseleves and
exit if they find the same serial number. I would hope to use a
firewall in the router to block such traffic, so copy 'A" of software
would be unable to see copy "B".
machines directly into it and see how they played together. Not ideal
but it wasn't really meant for test purposes, just for back-up.
What I've started doing now is keeping the system cloned onto another
HD, all the user data is on a mirroid RAID pair, and all three drives
live in an external SATA case, so that in the event of dire things
happening I can plug the whole thing into the back of another machine,
tell it to boot from the cloned system, and it *should* pick up where
the old one left off.
Does this seem like a workable approach?It does to me, but I know very little about these things really and
just tend to stumble my way through.
Thanks
--
Sara
Lord Byron: http://www.sarlet.com/byron.jpg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: test / backup server .... NAT question
- From: Luke Siemaszko
- Re: test / backup server .... NAT question
- References:
- test / backup server .... NAT question
- From: Luke Siemaszko
- test / backup server .... NAT question
- Prev by Date: Re: Sad news about Antony Lacey
- Next by Date: Re: Sad news about Antony Lacey
- Previous by thread: test / backup server .... NAT question
- Next by thread: Re: test / backup server .... NAT question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|