Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:45:24 +0000
On 16/12/05 12:15, in article
bogus-F306BD.00151116122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jack Campin - bogus
address" <bogus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> why do you insist on using a browser that won't render web pages
>> formatted using modern web standards? You'll have to change eventually,
>
> By which time there will be new standards to chase after. Meanwhile,
> using a trailing-edge browser is a good way to identify those content
> providers that care more about users than technologies.
Now hang on. Clive wrote the HTML so that it degrades to displaying an image
if the browser can't display the Flash object. He did the right thing here.
Now it just so happens that your browser thinks it can handle the Flash
object but can't, so doesn't display either. That's a bug in your browser.
> It is also a good way to test if your site is accessible to the blind.
> Have you done such testing?
He did.
There's a difference between a browser that doesn't have particular
features, and a browser that implements them badly. Lynx would appear to be
in the former class, and iCab the latter.
Cheers,
Chris
.
- References:
- OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Bonge Boo!
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Adrian Tuddenham
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Bonge Boo!
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Jack Campin - bogus address
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Bonge Boo!
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Adrian Tuddenham
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Bonge Boo!
- Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- From: Jack Campin - bogus address
- OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- Prev by Date: Re: Quad Questions
- Next by Date: Re: Importing Video
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Spare pair of eyes needed.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|