Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- From: hairy.biker@xxxxxxxxx (Andy Hewitt)
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:55:25 +0000
Jon B <black.hole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[Snipped Text]
> > Bugger, I just hit the order button 5 minutes ago too. Sorry. Is it
> > worth Emailing them with it anyway?
> >
>
> You could try, but I wouldn't worry about it. If it makes you feel
> better my referrer code is JBRADBURY ;)
Well, I've sent a support note off, nothing to lose I guess.
[Snipped Text]
> > Whoops.
>
> Drat no sudden reason for me to move a bit further up north then. It was
> actually a nice suprise the other week to find our exchange had been
> upgraded the other week to 2mb which I never expected as they'd only
> just finally got round to enabling the exchange with a 1mb dslam 9months
> previous.
We've been on a high speed since I've been here, I got straight onto
512k when we moved here last year, and the upgrade to 2Mb was easy too.
--
Andy Hewitt ** FAF#1, (Ex-OSOS#5) - FJ1200 ABS
Honda Civic: Windows free zone (Mac G5 Dual Processor)
<http://andyhewitt.webhop.net>
(updated Oct 26 2005)
.
- References:
- Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- From: Jon B
- Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- From: Andy Hewitt
- Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- From: Jon B
- Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- Prev by Date: Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- Next by Date: Re: Spotlight: faster but still useless
- Previous by thread: Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- Next by thread: Re: Choice on ISP for running web server.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
