Re: Floored advice from government about Mac online safety
- From: srm <srm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:08:02 +0200
David wrote:
Is anybody behind a 'firewalled' router with OSX's firewall switched on acting on the Govt's antivirus software advice? My experience [and that that I read about of many others] is that most of the Mac-specific antivirus apps are much more trouble than they are worth. Keep one ready to deploy once somebody spots a serious threat?
I run AV software on the mail server for our home network, even though two of our workstations run Linux and the third is OS X. (The Linux boxes are dual-boot with WinXP, but that's just for a few specific apps and we never use email when running Windows).
The server is an older machine that I was going to pension off but decided it could do some useful admin tasks. It's running SuSE Linux and collects mail (fetchmail) from our numerous email accounts, acts as a POP3 server, is also a Usenet server (leafnode), MySQL server and web server for site development work and our intranet.
I started using AV software on it (AntiVir) when we were still using WinXP boxes regularly. I decided to continue because it's actually a useful way of just junking these annoying messages (we get 10-50 virus-bearing mails a day). In other words, it's a useful part of our anti-spam system (we also run SpamAssassin). As it runs in the background and doesn't take any resources from the machines we actually work on, I figure, 'why not?'.
.
- References:
- Floored advice from government about Mac online safety
- From: zoaran substitute
- Floored advice from government about Mac online safety
- Prev by Date: Re: Digital Photo Management
- Next by Date: Re: Just been upgraded to 10Mb but getting only 3.5Mb
- Previous by thread: Floored advice from government about Mac online safety
- Next by thread: Re: Floored advice from government about Mac online safety
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|