Re: OT (NAT though NAT)
- From: NEWS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Roger Merriman)
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:43:52 +0100
Jon B <black.hole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roger Merriman <NEWS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > yesturday a faulty plug on the washing machine blew up my adsl ethernet
> > modem so off to get a adsl router from one of the stores.
> >
> > i have now got a netgear DG834G which brings the total of wireless
> > routers to 3. luckly you can turn off the wireless on the netgear which
> > is good as i really didn't want two wireless networks! ie i wanted just
> > a wired adls router, but unfortantly time wasn't my friend so i had to
> > make a choise really.
> >
> > now the i guess intresting thing at least to me is that i now have two
> > routers performing NAT, thats is
> >
> > netgear(192.168.0.***) conected via ethernet cable to a airport base
> > that is using NAT to dish out (10.0.1.***) addresses. as its happy like
> > this i wasn't going to change it, any issues that might arrise?
> >
> You may find the wired and wireless networks can't see each other. If
> you need this feature then you'll need to turn dhcp off on the airport
> and leave it to the Netgear. However presumably whatever you had before
> was handing out the IP addresses anyway, as was the airport basestation,
> so if it was working before it should be working now too.
yes i expect that any thing conected to the netgear will be unable to
iniate a conection to any thing conected to the airport base though,
should be able to do vis versa. this isn't a problem as i intend to keep
using the airport base to adim the tiny network i have here.
Roger
.
- References:
- OT (NAT though NAT)
- From: Roger Merriman
- Re: OT (NAT though NAT)
- From: Jon B
- OT (NAT though NAT)
- Prev by Date: Re: Dumb questions about digital cameras again. Rant on, and off!
- Next by Date: Re: OT (NAT though NAT)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT (NAT though NAT)
- Next by thread: Re: OT (NAT though NAT)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
