Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 11:29:14 +0100
On 9/10/05 11:25, in article 1h45wcx.oyf2451va3lclN%hairy.biker@xxxxxxxxx,
"Andy Hewitt" <hairy.biker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris Ridd <chrisridd@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [Snipped Text]
>
>>>> In fairness, FF 1.5 is only in beta now. I would expect beta software to
>>>> be less stable than a release version.
>>>
>>> Yes, but you wouldn't expect them to break things that already work!
>>
>> It can happen, and there's even a name for it. (A regression.)
>
> Yes, that much is obvious, but it seems a shame to make a step backwards
> without any (obvious) advantages elsewhere.
Well, that's really the nature of beta software I'm afraid.
Cheers,
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Roger Merriman
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Andy Hewitt
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- References:
- Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Andy Hewitt
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Ben Shimmin
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Peter Ceresole
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Ben Shimmin
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Luke Bosman
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Andy Hewitt
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Chris Ridd
- Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- From: Andy Hewitt
- Reproducible FireFox crash.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: BBC drama spooks Macs galore
- Next by Date: Re: OT: BBC drama spooks Macs galore
- Previous by thread: Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- Next by thread: Re: Reproducible FireFox crash.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|