Re: The Future of Home Computers
- From: Andrew Collier <spambucket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:47:25 +0100
In article <1128086756.020667.86140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"zoaran substitute" <nettid1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paul Russell wrote:
> > Fortran wasn't even invented until 1956.
Google says[1] it was described in a paper in November 1954 (though
admittedly not commercially released until 1957).
> I didn't even spot that. The language/grammar just looked like "young,
> modern geek" rather than "1950's magazine reporter" to me. Particularly
> "...how a 'home computer' could look like..." Just awkward.
Didn't the "Also the scientists readily admit that the computer will
require not yet invented technology to actually work," ring even more
alarm bells?
Andrew
[1] http://inventors.about.com/od/bstartinventors/a/John_Backus_3.htm
--
--- Andrew Collier ---- To reply by email, please use:
---- http://www.intensity.org.uk/ --- 'andrew {at} intensity.org.uk'
--
Have you lost your Marbles? http://www.marillion.com/
.
- References:
- The Future of Home Computers
- From: John Carrana
- Re: The Future of Home Computers
- From: Woody
- Re: The Future of Home Computers
- From: PeterD
- Re: The Future of Home Computers
- From: Paul Russell
- Re: The Future of Home Computers
- From: zoaran substitute
- The Future of Home Computers
- Prev by Date: Re: Sony Ericsson K750I and iCal - does it work with Macs?
- Next by Date: Re: Very cheap computing
- Previous by thread: Re: The Future of Home Computers
- Next by thread: Free webspace anywhere?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|