Re: Better ktrace ?

On 22/8/05 3:27, in article m3zmra9hcu.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jon
Schneider" <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there anything better than ktrace ? More like truss or strace ? I'm
> interested in the details of socket calls like connect and send.

There's strace, I suppose, but although there's a FreeBSD port for it it
won't work on darwin. I tried to fool configure, but it seems to want to
compile on i386 later on in :-(

If you're keen, get porting:

<http://sourceforge.net/projects/strace/>

Also take a look at sc_usage.

Cheers,

Chris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: /dev/random on linux, openssh 3.2.3p1
    ... A simple trace (truss, strace, ktrace, etc.) to see if SSH is reading ...
    (comp.security.ssh)
  • Re: /dev/random on linux, openssh 3.2.3p1
    ... A simple trace (truss, strace, ktrace, etc.) to see if SSH is reading ...
    (comp.security.ssh)
  • Better ktrace ?
    ... More like truss or strace? ... interested in the details of socket calls like connect and send. ... Jon ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: ktrace as a replacement for strace
    ... >>I'm looking for a replacement for the strace program I used to use on ... It looks like the bsd version of strace would be ... Take a look at the truss command in the base system, ... Is truss still being fixed to work without procfs or is ktrace a better ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: strace hard lock
    ... Well, normally, one would use truss or ktrace, since strace isn't ... part of the base system. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)