Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- From: Martin Gregorie <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:11:32 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:05:45 +0100, Will Kemp wrote:
Martin Gregorie wrote:Yes, it is.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:54:38 +0100, Will Kemp wrote:
If you do 'lsmod | grep thinkpad' is the thinkpad_acpi module inserted?
More RAM maybe? It does take quite a long time. There's a lot of diskI have 1GB, which should be enough for what this thing is running. Top
I/O to be done. Particularly if there are pages swapped out on the swap
partition.
shows 564 Kb of RAM in use. Besides, as somebody whose first proper multi-
user, multitasking mainframe only had between 96 and 128 KB of RAM (it
was a 32Kword 1902S running George 3 Mk 6 and running something like 4-6
MOP users and a couple of background jobs) I still think the amount of
memory this thing has is obscene.
OK, thanks - looks like my old Thinkpad 560Z and FC1 only had suspendBTW, what's the difference between 'hibernate' and 'suspend'?
"Suspend" suspends to RAM - i.e., it leaves the contents of RAM as they
are, pretty much, and does an orderly shutdown.
"Hibernate" suspends to disk - i.e., it writes the contents of the RAM
to the swap partition and then shuts down.
capability, which explains why it goes to sleep much faster.
Hibernate won't always work - if the total memory used (in RAM and inShouldn't be a problem then. I'm old school enough to make swap space
swap) are more than the size of the swap partition (after the hibernate
routine's cleared out unnecessary junk), it will just come back up
again.
twice the size of RAM.
It only works at boot time. It wouldn't make any difference what elseOf course. I was just wondering if any part of it (e.g. online help) was
was on the disk, if it's not built into Linux, it won't work.
on the recovery partition rather than being in ROM with the rest of it.
For more information about Linux on the Thinkpad, check outBookmarked. Thanks.
http://thinkwiki.org
Oh, and, by the way... You did install the x86_64 version of Fedora,No - bog standard 32 bit. Two reasons: I'm intending to use the same
didn't you? If you didn't, scrap the existing install and install that.
It's lots faster.
download to upgrade my NetVista over the next week or two and I don't do
anything that requires an address space of that size. In any case, this
is plenty fast enough for me as it stands.
--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- From: Will Kemp
- Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- References:
- Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- From: Martin Gregorie
- Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- From: Will Kemp
- Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- Prev by Date: DVD writer problems
- Next by Date: Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- Next by thread: Re: Is my old RedHat computer doomed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|