Re: Installing Red Hat

On 25/06/2008 11:09, chris wrote:

Not really, you only need a licence if you're requiring support.

Oh, I thought it required a serial number at install time? Dunno I've used Fedora/Whitebox/Centos since Redhat (non enterprise) Linux went away.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Linux is ten times the price of Microsoft, support costs
    ... Why don’t you call up Redhat and try to get an enterprise support contract? ... 'free' concept of Linux. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: C++ with VS.NET and Twilight of the Microsoft Era
    ... I have developed for linux. ... by Microsoft which seeks to give us development environments ... And redhat enterprise server software comes cheap? ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.language)
  • Re: Guide Line about Linux
    ... I could not recommend going back to Red Hat 9. ... Enterprise Linux 5. ... I want to know some question about redhat. ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: [SLE] Redhat vs SuSE Debate
    ... most of Linux is GPL'd or General Public License. ... are enthusiasts and developers who are for ... This is where SuSE and Redhat ... > have to pay for their enterprise versions. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10.
    ... >> RedHat isn't the only enterprise level Linux out there. ... tell us that NOVELLs market share (they own SuSE ... Those that are familiar with linux rarely, ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)