Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: "google@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 23, 8:34 am, Gordon Henderson <gordon+use...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's what I'd do...I'd be similar but I'd definitely have a /var/, especially if your /
1. Start from scratch.
/ 256MB
swap 2 x RAM
/usr 4 GB
/home Rest of disk. This is where you're going to store your music,
etc.
is only going to be 256MB.
I'd partition both drives with the same number of sectors and use RAID-1I'd be using LVM on that raid so I'd still have a /boot.
to mirror them.
Note: there's no /boot partition here. Why not? Well, the idea of a
/boot originates (I think) from the days when old PC BIOSes had a limit
to the number of cylinders they could access, so it was important to
make sure the linux kernel was inside that limit, so the idea of a small
/boot partition arose.
My disks would be 50MB partition 1 for /boot
the rest partition 2 for LVM.
Currently each partition would then be a separate RAID1 although with
kpartx and /dev/mapper/loop0p* it ought now be possible to have the
raid over the entire disk - which should mean you don't even have to
recreate the partition table or reinstall grub if/when a disk fails
and you replace it.
I think the latest versions of GRUB might support LVM directly which
would be another possibility.
Tim.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: Jonathan Buzzard
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- References:
- Partitioning hard drives...
- From: zed
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: Gordon Henderson
- Partitioning hard drives...
- Prev by Date: Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- Next by Date: Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- Previous by thread: Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- Next by thread: Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|