Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: rich <rich@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:01:30 GMT
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:59:30 +0100, Ian Rawlings wrote:
On 2008-06-23, rich <rich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All the rest is divided up into ext3 data partitions. If you do any video
editing its worth having a NTFS partition for big video files. I also have
a small fat32 partition which is shared with a winxp virtual machine.
Hmm, how big are your files? ext3 can handle a file up to 2 terabytes
in size, although with a 1k block size it'll only handle 16 gigabytes
in a single file.
Or is there some other reason for using NTFS for large files? I'd
have thought ext3 would be better as it's actually supported ;-)
You are of course correct, its more to do with the software I use (win vid
editor running in wine) that seems to balk at big files unless on my ntfs
partition. I find that ntfs-3g works fine and is handy for my portable usb
hdd that gets shared with a windows box.
--
rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: Simon Dalley
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- References:
- Partitioning hard drives...
- From: zed
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: rich
- Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- From: Ian Rawlings
- Partitioning hard drives...
- Prev by Date: Browser DNS balancing effects
- Next by Date: Re: Browser DNS balancing effects
- Previous by thread: Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- Next by thread: Re: Partitioning hard drives...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|