Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- From: Mike Civil <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
In article <g5tfy4qb78+Zeigler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Skype uses your computer as a part of P2P network. Your computer is used
to route other people calls *TOO*. It is up to you to decide if you want
to tolerate it. *I* do not like it. Network admins responsible for
security seem do not like it too. Thanks God I have not been forced to
face "Afghanistan quality" Internet connectivity :-)
Hmm, if you don't want to act as a supernode then you don't have to. In
fact if you're behind a NAT layer or a http or Socks proxy then you'll
never be a supernode.
Have you read up on what Skype actually does?
Try:-
http://www.skype.com/security/universities/
Specifically:-
"Beginning with Skype 3.0, an explicit switch is provided in the
registry settings to allow the disabling of supernode functionality."
"Any computer hosted on a network that is behind a network address
translation (NAT) device or restrictive firewall will disable supernode
functionality."
"Skype clients behind an HTTP or SOCKS5 proxy will not serve as
supernodes."
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- From: Andrzej Adam Filip
- Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- References:
- Can't install skype on an AMD64 system (Ubuntu)
- From: myemail.an@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux [Was: Can't install skype on an AMD64 system (Ubuntu)]
- From: Gordon Henderson
- Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux [Was: Can't install skype on an AMD64 system (Ubuntu)]
- From: Will Kemp
- Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- From: Andrzej Adam Filip
- Can't install skype on an AMD64 system (Ubuntu)
- Prev by Date: Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- Next by Date: Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- Next by thread: Re: SIP v. Skype *on* Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|