Re: Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- From: nick@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Leverton)
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:12:20 +0000 (UTC)
In article <87wt25rewq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Nix <$}xinix{$@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
On 21 Feb 2007, Nick Leverton verbalised:
This is just a quick thought based on your comment about already running
BIND yourself. Not really researched in depth - in particular I'm not
sure if BIND is secure enough to run DDNS over the internet, even though
it does have cryptographic keys for authorisation and has been rewritten
at least once in recent years.
IIRC a significant number of root nameservers run BIND, so it can't have
*too* awful a security record (root servers being rather critical things
even now that there are hundreds of them).
For sure. I was more concerned about the DDNS bit of the scheme as I
don't know how much exposure to the net that's had.
Nick
--
http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself
.
- References:
- Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- From: Theo Markettos
- Re: Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- From: Nick Leverton
- Re: Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- From: Nix
- Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- Prev by Date: Re: parcelforce website
- Next by Date: Re: Use of Linux in UK education & publicly funded offices ends today.
- Previous by thread: Re: Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- Next by thread: Re: Dynamic DNS services and other DNS contortions
- Index(es):