Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- From: Dave Page <grimoire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:36:57 +0000
Jeff Gaines wrote:
> The key question is do I stick with the Debian kernel source, which is
> 2.6.8 (from memory) or go for the latest 2.16.15.1 from
> http://www.kernel.org/ ?
If you stick with the Debian kernel-source and kernel-image packages,
then when security flaws are discovered, you should get automatic
updates from the Debian security repository. This is a strong advantage.
> Also if I do d/l and use the latest source does it 'break' the package
> management in Debian, which I find enormously useful? In fact does it
> stop being a Debian install and become something else?
It shouldn't really "break" apt. You won't have a kernel-source package
corresponding to the upstream source you've installed in /usr/src/linux,
but when you use make-kpkg, you will get a kernel-image .deb for
2.6.15.1 which will satisfy any dependencies of software on a 2.6 kernel
(for example, module-init-tools).
Dave
Attachment:signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- From: Darren Salt
- Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- References:
- Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- From: Jeff Gaines
- Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- Prev by Date: Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- Next by Date: Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- Previous by thread: Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- Next by thread: Re: Building a Kernel - Debian Sarge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|