Re: PoPToP problem
- From: Sak Wathanasin <sw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:40:11 +0100
In article <43127f97$0$1299$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Glenn Robinson" <Glenn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Good try, WInXP firewall is well and trully off.
>
In that case, what's sitting in front of the Linux box? Is it a NATing
router? If so, does it NAT GRE correctly? Many low-end routers won't. Post
some extracts from your Linux logs.
> > Try changing the 172.16.1.3 address to some thing else that doesn't
> > conflict.
> >
>
> Tried that already, I hade localip 172.16.1.110-115, same problem
No, .13 is the IP of your Linux box and is the correct config.
--
Sak Wathanasin
Network Analysis Limited
http://www.network-analysis.ltd.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PoPToP problem
- From: Martin Liddle
- Re: PoPToP problem
- References:
- Re: PoPToP problem
- From: Sak Wathanasin
- Re: PoPToP problem
- From: Glenn Robinson
- Re: PoPToP problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Addressing problem with NATted DMZ
- Next by Date: Re: Addressing problem with NATted DMZ
- Previous by thread: Re: PoPToP problem
- Next by thread: Re: PoPToP problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
