Re: Slow network
- From: paulSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul Sherwin)
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:38:08 GMT
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:35:33 +0100, Steve <no-one@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:05:40 +0000, Paul Sherwin wrote:
>>
>> NFS isn't the fastest protocol in the world. The default packet size
>> is very small so it's standard proactice to specify
>> 'rsize=8192,wsize=8192' when mounting the volume. I don't know how you
>> will have mounted it using Mandriva.
>
>I used the control centre - looking at 'mount' packet sizes appear to be
>set to 8192. From what I've read, I thought that NFS was the 'standard'
>network protocol for Linux. Is there something better I should consider
>for another time?
NFS is the standard file sharing protocol, but it's not normally used
for large data transfers. It's not too bad with the maximum packet
sizes and you shouldn't be seeing this dreadful performance.
>> You could just tar the files into an archive and transfer them with FTP :-)
>
>I get 'connection refused' message, whether or not the remote is mounted.
>Time for more reading.....
This suggests you don't have the FTP daemon running so your FTP client
has nothing to connect to. I don't know either of your distros well
(certainly not all the graphical front end stuff) so can't tell you
exactly how to do this.
Best regards, paul
--
Paul Sherwin Consulting http://paulsherwin.co.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow network
- From: Darren Salt
- Re: Slow network
- References:
- Slow network
- From: Steve
- Re: Slow network
- From: Paul Sherwin
- Re: Slow network
- From: Steve
- Slow network
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow network
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Media 9 Video Codecs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Slow network
- Next by thread: Re: Slow network
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|