Re: Scanning film negatives
- From: "Mark BR" <briley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:13:52 +0700
"Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot" <ufdi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0dednaVPEZZTbmneRVny0Q@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Martin Underwood wrote:I have not been happy with the scanning of negatives, it isn't easy, very
You could probably buy a flat-bed scanner with a transparency adaptor
fairly cheaply these days. You may still spend a fair amount of
money, but at least it will be an investment.
My Epson Perfection 1200 Photo scanner can take four mounted slides
at the same time or a single transparency up to 100x130 mm. I used it
to scan some very old glass negatives dating from around 1900 and,
allowing for the fact that the negs were
underexposed/underdeveloped/faded, the results were surprisingly good.
Thanks Martin, there's a couple on Ebay I'll keep an eye on. Don't suppose
you and your scanner live anywhere near Ramsgate? ;)
Si
time consuming and the results were poor.
Can it be more economic to print the photo's and then use any bog standard
(i.e. cheap) scanner to get them digitised?
Mark BR
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scanning film negatives
- From: Mungo \"two sheds\" Toadfoot
- Re: Scanning film negatives
- From: Martin Underwood
- Re: Scanning film negatives
- References:
- Scanning film negatives
- From: Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot
- Re: Scanning film negatives
- From: Martin Underwood
- Re: Scanning film negatives
- From: Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot
- Scanning film negatives
- Prev by Date: Re: Scanning film negatives
- Next by Date: Re: Scanning film negatives
- Previous by thread: Re: Scanning film negatives
- Next by thread: Re: Scanning film negatives
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|