Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- From: donotreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Norm)
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:13:30 GMT
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:14:18 GMT, DCA <dca860MAPS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
dave wrote:
On 28 Mar 2008 11:53:22 GMT, "Jeff Gaines"A lite edition of Acronis is available as a free download from
<jgaines_newsid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Again there may be better partitioning s/w than FDISK, perhaps somebody
could recommend a free one - if you have a proper XP install disk then you
can boot form that, delete the existing partition, tell it to create a new
one then F3 to abort the installation once it has.
If you do have a proper XP CD it may just be easier to re-install while
you have no apps/data on the new PC. You can avoid putting all the crud on
that PC suppliers seem to think is essential
I use acronis products for "this kind of thing". Not perfect but so
far has proved reliable and very fast - however it does cost.
http://eu.acronis.com/
I use their True vector and Disc Director and image to a removable
HDrive. You can (and should) make a bootable CD of these items. Easy
to do from the menus.
Seagate/Maxtor website which is enough for the majority of cloning
operations .
It is called Maxblaster, and only works if there is a Seagate/Maxtor
drive plugged in somewhere (although it does not have to be
source/destination drive)
Free acronis trueimage 8 at
http://www.acronis.co.uk/mag/cbuy/ati8pe/
Norm
(Please do not reply by email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- From: Les Matthew
- Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- References:
- Recommended size of OS partition?
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- From: Jeff Gaines
- Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- From: DCA
- Recommended size of OS partition?
- Prev by Date: Re: PATA sometimes faster than SATA?
- Next by Date: WindowsXP
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- Next by thread: Re: Recommended size of OS partition?
- Index(es):