Re: RAID array for home


"GSV Three Minds in a Can" <GSV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DLxggNEOdl$GFAbS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bitstring <1i57tte.1eghku3cxa0yeN%me@xxxxxxxxxxx>, from the wonderful
person xmas <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> said
After a recent drive failure, I want to set up a RAID array at home both
for speed of data access and redundancy. Never set one up before, but
would like to do it in hardware rather than relying on Windows: any
recommendations?

'Don't' would probably be my first response.

'Do' would be mine!


Speed - you won't see much, if any, benefit unless you are routinely using
huge files.

RAID 1 is duplication, and there should be no speed improvement.


Redundancy - So you have the data replicated across 2 (or more) hard
drives, but the whole thing still relies on one RAID controller, CPU,
motherboard, PSU etc. In particular if the controller goes South you may
be stuffed. If one disk fails (which is what you are guarding against) you
MAY be able to rebuild the array (assuming you can source an identical
disk), but several folks have discovered that isn't so easy either (you
don't find out until it fails, of course).

However, even if you can't rebuild the array, the one working disk still has
all the data on it, and it is still accessible. So, you still have your
precious data.

I agree that you still need backup, for example in case the controller
fails, but RAID 1 really helps. (See my post here a couple of weeks ago.)


If you really want speed, buy a Raptor (and ear plugs). If you really want
redundancy, copy everything to a completely separate PC, or server,
someplace else on the network (preferably in another building!).

Windows Home Server, or a NAS, look reasonable for backup, but I'd still
keep everything on my own PC as well.

--
GSV Three Minds in a Can
9,423 Km walked. 1,827Km PROWs surveyed. 33.2% complete.


.

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Reccomendations for FC-attached storage appliance?
    ... In a practical sense if a fiber channel card fails on a server, ... properly load balance or fail over the disk IO. ... > same disks via the redundant server or controller. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Hows RAID doing?
    ... My take is that redundancy and ... The advantage of using RAID here is that when a disk fails, ... > out hard drives before they fail. ...
    (comp.os.linux.hardware)
  • SUMMARY: Disk contention problems
    ... If a controller had actually failed, this can trigger the array to ... sccli> show redundancy-mode ... Primary controller location: Lower ... Redundancy mode: Active-Active ...
    (SunManagers)
  • Re: RAID 1 with IDE HDD
    ... >called RAID since there is no redundancy) and RAID-1 is mirroring. ... >if the disk controller starts spewing garbage when the first disk ... virtually any fault tolerant system ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: RAID newbie...can I have several partitions on a RAID 1 array?
    ... A cold spare is exactly that. ... But it is redundancy. ... If the OB as a "RAID newbe" has a controller ... For the OP it means that with a hardware failure, ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)