Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- From: Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:48:43 GMT
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:03:14 +0100, Mark
<i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:11:04 +0100, Daniel James
<wastebasket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
news:<vbeof3lqh845laef5per8h1c2hhvcl3ouc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
That all sounds pretty much ideal. I hadn't really looked for uATX
boards (or smaller!) since I expected them to be more expensive.
No, they're surprisingly cheap. Onboard graphics is much more common on
uATX than on ATX, too.
Hope the above ramble is helpful ...
Twas, thanks.
.. and I can add that I found time to download a more recent knoppix
last night (5.1.1 with a 2.6.19 kernel) and try it on my box.
Everything seems to be recognized OK. The SATA drive is visible and
lspci gives sensible names to all the nVidia-controlled devices, so
linux support is looking good with any reasonably recent distro.
I've found knoppix works well with SATA RAID drives. It does have a
problem with some Nvidea graphics cards though.
Works for me - I'll be using VNC to remote framebuffer it, not the
builtin hardware.
Cheers - Jaimie
.
- References:
- Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- From: Jaimie Vandenbergh
- Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- From: Jaimie Vandenbergh
- Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- From: Mark
- Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- Prev by Date: Re: How to reinstall a laptop with no peripherals?
- Next by Date: Re: Disruption to Royal Mail postal services - 5th, 6th, 8th and 9th October 2007
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- Next by thread: Re: Recommends for an ickle Linux server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|