Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- From: Albert Ross <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:09:48 +0100
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:10:06 GMT, "Dorothy Bradbury"
<dorothybradbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One note is that there are many factors involved...
<interesting stuff snipped>
This applies to all hard drive makers, so act accordingly...
o Hard drives are cheap -- having a backup is cheap
o Multiple vendors exist -- make the backup a different brand
Yes good point, that was why I went for USB drives, they could be used
on both boxen, easier/quicker to transfer stuff than over ethernet,
one box has a faster burner than t'other, I *was* supposedly going for
reliability, I'll trial some different manufacturers' disks on future
purchases.
I've been using Verbatim media forever, back since floppies actually
*were* floppy, had generally low levels of failure, I have a couple of
sites bookmarked which discuss performance of different dyes on CDs
and DVDs.
http://www.wilhelm-research.com/index.html
is an interesting source of information on dye/pigment life of inkjet
and other prints and photographs, from personal experience some brands
of films from when I did trials in the eighties have survived much
better than others, likewise there are huge differences in films I
inherited from my father going back to the fifties/sixties, and
anecdotally I had a collection of postcards nailed to the wall, some
faded within weeks, others still looked original after many years, but
whatever the media entropy will get you in the end . . .
.
- References:
- Seagate Clunk Of Death
- From: Albert Ross
- Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- From: ajmoss_throwaway_account_001
- Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- From: Dr.H@l0nf1r£$
- Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- From: Dorothy Bradbury
- Seagate Clunk Of Death
- Prev by Date: Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- Next by Date: Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- Previous by thread: Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- Next by thread: Re: Seagate Clunk Of Death
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|