Re: Dual Chan more important than Mhz speed ??
- From: mark <marc.martin9@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:44:58 +0200
mark wrote:
Trimble wrote:Agree a "pseudo" (software) multithreading and speed is a cheap way to solve
With a dual channel RAM system, even on the fastest current processors,
does the MHz & timings speed matter that much between say 667 & 800 ??
5-5-5-15 & 4-4-4-12 etc.?
Every body seems to worry over the MHz / timings & little mention of Dual
Chan ?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") Mouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eMGbDJmgv0
Will give you an interesting overview of how a multithreaded engineering
is beneficial to the hardware. So i would say depends on OS. But as a fact
here the h/w matters in quantity not speed.
Cheers.
the "problem" i guess.
.
- References:
- Dual Chan more important than Mhz speed ??
- From: Trimble
- Re: Dual Chan more important than Mhz speed ??
- From: mark
- Dual Chan more important than Mhz speed ??
- Prev by Date: Re: Got an old Pent3 500Mhz
- Next by Date: Re: Got an old Pent3 500Mhz
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual Chan more important than Mhz speed ??
- Next by thread: Strange problem with Logitech MX700 cordless mouse. Any ideas please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
