Re: seagate drives -nothing but trouble
- From: "Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlawyer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 May 2006 01:48:26 -0700
Dorothy Bradbury wrote:
The physics of failure start with the housing for them. It's almost as
A lot of varying characteristics combine re Physics Of Failure.
--
if the racks supplied in PC cases were an after thought.
I.e.
No reasonable air space between the drives, tucked in at the most
convenient place in the box so that you can't access the cabling face
on. You can't put a fan anywhere useful on the housing and overall just
crap thinking in box design that is still the trade standard.
You might forgive 20 or so years of this shit if it was a motorbike,
submarine, fighter aircraft, lawn mower or satellite, -where size and
weight are tantamount to usability.
But a bloody hold-all? FFS!
And it is just a tool box really -except that it has one criterion
above all else. It should permit good cooling for the parts it contains.
.
- References:
- seagate drives -nothing but trouble
- From: Graham Chapman
- Re: seagate drives -nothing but trouble
- From: Dorothy Bradbury
- seagate drives -nothing but trouble
- Prev by Date: Re: Two more obvious questions.
- Next by Date: Re: Two more obvious questions.
- Previous by thread: Re: seagate drives -nothing but trouble
- Next by thread: Speed the beast (lamb) up- Faster 2D Graphics perhaps?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|