Re: XP Home problem

"3T39" <rubbishrat@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:43b45ccc$0$903$db0fefd9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

It is not clear from what you have stated thus far where we are
starting from. Please would you clarify:

> I sold a Packard Bell Imedia computer in May this year (05)
> which was running xp home, all activated and updated etc
> together with the licence sticker on the side.

1) You presumably sold it as a second-hand PC?

2) Who supplied XP Home and applied the licence sticker:

- Packard Bell

- you

- someone else

(the wording on the sticker may provide useful infomation)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP Home problem
    ... You presumably sold it as a second-hand PC? ... Who supplied XP Home and applied the licence sticker: ... sticker is the original supplied by Packard Bell/NEC. ... reall way of knowing whether the installed system was the original or not ...
    (uk.comp.homebuilt)
  • Re: For the last time
    ... "That means the distribution rights of a copyright holder end on that ... particular copy once the copy is sold." ... To clarify - it wasn't "my" statement. ...
    (rec.music.progressive)
  • Re: FS: Restored Monster Bash $8500.00
    ... I guess i should clarify, i bought one of Brian Kellys perfectly ... restored MB for $6K several months ago and sold it recently for 6K ... play. ...
    (rec.games.pinball)