Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Mike Tomlinson <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:00:07 +0000
In article <2005111705265885168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johnny B Good
<jcs.computersbutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> Not all the caps of same value and ratings fitted to a MoBo are going
>to be equally pushed to their limits, so the 'survivors' may well have
>years and years of service life left in them.
My suggestion that all caps of a certain make and value wasn't
predicated on the basis of their "survivability", but on the fact that
most failed caps on motherboards are from those manufacturers that used
the stolen, incomplete electrolyte formula.
Those caps have a serious manufacturing defect, and the failure rate is
100%, so if you're going to strip a PC down and take the board out to
replace a few, you might as well do the lot. Note I'm _not_ advocating
re-capping the entire board - just the caps from the dodgy makers.
Luxon and OST.IQ are two. www.badcaps.net has more info.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Johnny B Good
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- References:
- Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Jaimie Vandenbergh
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Johnny B Good
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Steven Briggs
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Jaimie Vandenbergh
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Johnny B Good
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Jaimie Vandenbergh
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Johnny B Good
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: John Jordan
- Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- From: Johnny B Good
- Slowly dropping Vdd values
- Prev by Date: Re: DVD Decoder
- Next by Date: Graphic card manufacturers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- Next by thread: Re: Slowly dropping Vdd values
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|