Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- From: "Ralph Wade Phillips" <ralphp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:43:04 -0500
Howdy!
"Jim Howes" <sewoh.mij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:djl7bb$80u$1$8302bc10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bernard Peek wrote:
> > Bear in mind that NT4 and W2K use different versions of NTFS. IIRC if
> > you install an NT4 formatted disk in a W2K system it will silently
> > reformat the drive and you won't be able to go back to NT4.
>
> Another reason to use the lowest-common-denominator (i.e. FAT32)
filesystem.
Ahem. NT4 doesn't do FAT32 either - you're stuck at 2G FAT16
volumes.
>
> Does anyone know exactly why Win2K refuses to format disks above an
apparently
> purely arbitary limit (71Gb?) as FAT32, while Linux's mkdosfs (atleast
version
> 2.8) seems to be happy doing it.
32G, and because Microsoft made that decision.
There's no TECHNICAL reason, it's purely political.
RwP
.
- References:
- usb 2 external hard drive
- From: DNA
- Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- From: Jim Howes
- Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- From: Bernard Peek
- Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- From: Jim Howes
- usb 2 external hard drive
- Prev by Date: Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- Next by Date: Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- Previous by thread: Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- Next by thread: Re: usb 2 external hard drive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|