Re: Quietish budget PSU




"John Jordan" <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3mkdeiF16rpbpU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Synapse Syndrome wrote:
>> "John Jordan" <junk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:3mficfF16bu2jU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>>However, quietness and PFC are not necessarily related to efficiency.
>>>
>>
>> How can quietness not be related to efficiency? If the power supply is
>> efficient, it will produce less heat. If it is less hot, there is less
>> need for fans, so they can spin slower, or replaced altogether with
>> heatsinks.
>
> That's correct. "Not directly correlated" would have been a better phrase.
> You can have a very quiet PSU that isn't very efficient, and you can have
> a very loud PSU that's also very efficient. However, it's easier to make
> an efficient PSU quiet.
>
> Note that efficiency for a particular PSU is not constant. A PSU will
> generally be less efficient at light loads.
>
>> And the whole point of PFC is efficiency, with active PFC being more
>> efficient and costly than passive PFC...
>
> Efficiency of mains wiring and beyond, not the power consumption of the
> PSU itself. Because PCs are usually a tiny fraction of maximum home
> consumption, it's unlikely to make any measurable difference anywhere
> because the cables are rated at 3KW+. Maybe if you had a few racks of PCs
> running SETI.
>
> One situation where it may make a difference is when you're running off a
> UPS. With a lower PF, you'd need a higher VA rating and your run-time may
> be less.
>
>
>> Hmmn. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Factor_Correction
>> "Power factor correction (PFC) is a widely used technique in electrical
>> engineering used to counteract the effects of load capacitance or
>> inductances that would otherwise lead to an undesirable power factor,
>> which wastes energy. It is designed to work on an AC power circuit so
>> that as little reactive power as possible is transferred between source
>> and load."
>
> Doesn't state where the power is wasted, so no contradiction.
>
>> http://www.endpcnoise.com/cgi-bin/e/pfc.html
>> "The preferable type of PFC is Active Power Factor Correction (Active
>> PFC) since it provides more efficient power frequency. Because Active PFC
>> uses a circuit to correct power factor, Active PFC is able to generate a
>> theoretical power factor of over 95%. Active Power Factor Correction also
>> markedly diminishes total harmonics, automatically corrects for AC input
>> voltage, and is capable of a full range of input voltage. Since Active
>> PFC is the more complex method of Power Factor Correction, it is more
>> expensive to produce an Active PFC power supply."
>
> Doesn't state the effect of diminishing total harmonics, so no
> contradiction.
>
>> http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/AC_11.html
>> "In a purely resistive circuit, all circuit power is dissipated by the
>> resistor(s). Voltage and current are in phase with each other.
>> In a purely reactive circuit, no circuit power is dissipated by the
>> load(s). Rather, power is alternately absorbed from and returned to the
>> AC source. Voltage and current are 90o out of phase with each other. "
>
> Direct agreement, but no discussion of consequence.
>
>> "....This lower total current will translate to less heat losses in the
>> circuit wiring, meaning greater system efficiency (less power wasted)."
>
> "circuit wiring". No mention of magnitudes, so no contradiction.
>
>> http://www.zalman.co.kr/eng/product/view.asp?idx=76&code=
>> "By implementing Active PFC, the power factor (PF) is improved from 75%
>> (Passive PFC) to 94% (at full load), while harmful harmonic frequencies
>> are reduced below regulatory requirements."
>
> Again, doesn't state the effects of reducing harmonics. No contradiction.
>
>> I think that these cites can be taken as more authorative than Dan's
>> Data, which is just full of one guy's personal views on thing.
>
> They don't contradict him though, and he does explain the reasoning in
> detail so you can decide for yourself. Personally I spent two hours
> testing PSUs with a wattmeter :-)
>
> I'm a little surprised that you didn't find a single quote that claimed a
> direct link between power factor and PSU efficiency. I'm sure there are
> plenty around.
>
>
> A review I found, showing no link between PFC and efficiency, although
> unfortunately no power factor measurements:
>
> http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q4/psus/index.x?pg=1
> http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q4/psus/index.x?pg=15
>


I really recommend that you invest in a high quality Active PFC power supply
unit, maybe a Zalman or Tagan. They are very quiet and hardly get warm at
all. You will never look back.

ss.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quietish budget PSU
    ... quietness and PFC are not necessarily related to efficiency. ... "Why do power supplies make noise? ... "The preferable type of PFC is Active Power Factor Correction (Active PFC) ...
    (uk.comp.homebuilt)
  • Re: Power: What Size, Brand To Trust
    ... does active PFC really help? ... FSP is one of the suppliers to PC Power & Cooling and makes ... Very few websites provide trustworthy PSU reviews. ...
    (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
  • Re: simple-minded non-OFDM signal design question
    ... be made just as robust as, e.g., OFDM. ... the Grand Alliance that 16QAM would not survive the multipath channel. ... jiving with the spectral efficiency comparison. ... the addition of the pilot tone reduces the power ...
    (comp.dsp)
  • Re: Seeking Fiscal Health Without Gas Tax
    ... to handle hybrid cars as well, since the power load will be so high. ... the same as the extra cost of the car. ... generators and power their own homes rather than buying electricity ... lowering the overall efficiency to about 30%. ...
    (misc.transport.road)
  • Re: Power Consumption (was: Re: AMDs well may be running dry)
    ... It's as much about competition and marketing as anything else. ... efficiency factors in just like having a portable operating ... So what percentage of power would be reduced by, say, solid state ... Power consumption and the amount of heat generated pretty much track ...
    (comp.os.vms)