Re: Dual processor system
- From: "Synapse Syndrome" <synapse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:30:41 +0000 (UTC)
"Paul F" <nonono@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dbc6lu$bia$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "GSV Three Minds in a Can" <GSV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:cpRMOcCdLZ2CFAD8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>>
>> Do you =mean= 'dual processor' (as in Xeon, or Opteron) or do you mean
>> 'dual core' (as in Athlon64 x2 or Intel Pentium D)? Makes quite a lot of
>> difference to the design, build, and cost.
>>
>> Or you could actually go for dual 'dual cores CPUs' (for a total of 4).
>> 8>.
>>
>> --
>> GSV Three Minds in a Can
>> Contact recommends the use of Firefox; SC recommends it at gunpoint.
>
> Hello GSV
>
> As written. I meant 'dual' as in two processors.
>
Wouldn't it be cheaper and easier to get a dual core system?
ss.
.
- References:
- Dual processor system
- From: Paul F
- Re: Dual processor system
- From: GSV Three Minds in a Can
- Re: Dual processor system
- From: Paul F
- Dual processor system
- Prev by Date: Re: Mainboard/CPU Temps
- Next by Date: Re: Won't boot into Safe Mode
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual processor system
- Next by thread: Re: Dual processor system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|