Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: "Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 21:48:35 -0000
"Julie" <000@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:se3us3hsb58ga987kt9nhqv038lslea4ln@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:45:00 -0000, "Pat Gardiner"
<patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Julie" <000@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:puqts396fn8h7b6ijp4s2q1hhn97o3pt5t@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:49:21 -0000, "Pat Gardiner"
<patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jim Webster" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:638669F26mjc0U3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Voroshilov" <lee.nfld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cd3b2571-38cb-4a10-8c8a-5d0fea1c7240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I wish I'd kept a list of the number of times he said I was going to
Note to Pat - Just in case Prince Philip orders MI6 to bump you off,
a
copy of this message has been stored in a disused nuclear bunker in
Montana guarded by crazed right-wing gun nuts.
be
bankrupted/disgraced/forced to flee
I don't recall using those exact words, but I think that you did pick up
the
general drift accurately.
It's just that you seem to have difficulty in extrapolating the logical
consequences of your actions, even though you seem to understand what
people
are telling you.
You support government officials that have been faking blood tests
during
an
epidemic and threatening anyone who complaints.
Then it turns out that you have become a lobbyist for Britain's very
prestigious Country Land and Business Association and their
representative
in meetings with Defra.
You forgot to mention that you are now their National Livestock Advisor,
can
give up scratching a living, start travelling and become prosperous.
I'm pleased for you. It is obviously an award for your leadership during
the
2001 FMD epidemic and your resolute support for the cull and
over-compensation. You did a good job shouting anyone down who favoured
vaccination and should be compensated for the enemies made thereby.
You would think that you would keep your head down for a bit, and yet,
you
still behave as if you were an eighteen year old hooligan hanging about
on
back street corners continuing to leada gang of idiots mugging passers
by.
Of course disaster stares you in the face. The pigs are sick and you
were
wrong to try to silence me. Your roof will, in the end, fall in.
You seem to think my testimony discredited by taking so long to be
vindicated. You are responsible.
Do you want to take credit for the British people not being told about
MRSA
in pigs?
You are welcome to it.
Now off you go. BiBi
Don't let him off the hook like that Pat.
I would like to give the Executive of the CLA the chance to explain
Jims behavior before going on to the National Press and showing them
what the CLA through Jim have to say on the subject. I'm sure they all
find it fascinating.
I think time will take care of that. A lot of people have suffered from
MRSA
one way or another.
I've shown very convincingly that something has been very wrong in Britain
for nearly a decade and did the best that one man, on his own, was able to
do.
In the US alone - 100,000 cases a year, 19,000 deaths. They are looking
for
some culprits.
Mr Webster was not at any real risk, at first, by making such an effort to
wrongfully discredit me. He hadn't got any money. He told us all that.
But suddenly he emerges as a big man - powerful and important. There is
money, for the first time.
He is reinvented as the National Livestock Advisor for the big money
organisation for landowners, packed with prestige and in-house lawyers:
the
people that own England, Scotland and Wales: the aristocracy- the famous
landed gentry of the world's oldest monarchy.
The class action lawyers know they have hit the jackpot. I've given them
the
evidence, Mr Webster has given them the target - old money and fabulous
wealth. The stench of virtually unlimited wealth is unmistakable dating
back
to sugar and slaves. Rapacious Yankee carpet baggers don't miss things
like
that.
They won't believe that he wasn't following instructions without
supervision. They will believe that he was taken from abject poverty, the
mud scraped off and thrust in the front row to protect the loot taken
during
FMD.
Both sides know he is dispensable.
That's what happens when peasants grovel at the feet of their betters.
They
get the dirty jobs and are kicked into the ditch when no longer needed. It
is their traditional fate.
The CLA have very limited time now to back him or sack him. That he chose
to
invent stories about a former PLC founder and director is going to bother
them. Their members populate the Boards of most of Britain's big companies
and they will feel uneasy that he went a step too far.
They can hardly pretend convincingly that they did not know. This has been
going on for a decade.
And what are the CLA doing appointing a livestock adviser who spends
his time bullying and trying to cover up MRSA in livestock. Mocking a
very real risk and proclaiming almost that it doesn't exist? That
would make fascinating reading in the nationals I'm sure.
Murdoch has been tracking the story of pig health for years using the Times.
Neither Valerie Elliot, their usual farming journalist or Jonathon Miller,
when he was a columnist for the Sunday Times, seem to be fully in the
picture.
It was a natural for Miller, but he might have been thought to have the
wrong style.
The Times published a bombshell back in 2000, it is mentioned on my site.
Very unusually, they pulled the story very quickly and few seem to have
noticed it. Although it was printed in the daily newspaper, it was removed
from their site. I can understand why.
If there were any faults in the telling they were in the most serious
trouble, but I have the gut feeling it was essentially true and had been
withdrawn following representations. Maybe he got promised something in
return. Murdoch is a businessman, not without principles, but with very
different ones.
Certainly, variations of the story, elaborations is a better word, were
circulating in the media at the time but not published. Later, there was
strong circumstantial evidence that these stories were indeed true.
I was talking today to a farmer who was telling me of the number of sows now
being culled locally and I mentioned the rumours to him. He immediately
attached them to events on the Suffolk/Norfolk border at that time. Oddly
one of the protagonists has suddenly surfaced backing pig production after
years keeping their head down.
That is all very cryptic isn't it? Well, I'm not going where Murdoch fears
to go.
What I will say is that the story clearly pointed to CSF and probably FMD
coming into Britain in a live pig. It suggested who brought the pig in and
why they were protected by Defra (then MAFF).
When I first came to ukba, I came for help, but as soon as I suggested that
FMD and CSF might have common sources in live imports the abuse started.
Look back. I simply felt that overcrowding and sickness became a magnet for
other illnesses. I was not allowed to say that.
Waugh was an obvious fabrication and instead, Bushmeat became the favoured
explanation, despite the fact it was both illogical and touted by some very
unsavoury characters.
Murdoch's article is the "something nasty in the woodshed" feared most by
the CLA, the PM and just about everyone else.
There is no possibility of me taking it further. I do not know that it is
true, only that it is dangerous.
It does not alter the fact that I have been the victim of a defamation
campaign run by the man who is now the National Livestock Advisor of the
CLA. They can explain themselves, not me.
MRSA in pigs is now the story, not me.
--
Regards
Pat Gardiner
www.go-self-sufficient.com
.
- References:
- MRSA - What Next?
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Huw
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Voroshilov
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: MRSA - What Next?
- From: Pat Gardiner
- MRSA - What Next?
- Prev by Date: Re: MRSA - What Next?
- Next by Date: Re: MRSA - What Next?
- Previous by thread: Re: MRSA - What Next?
- Next by thread: Re: MRSA - What Next?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|