Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Peter Duncanson <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:30:53 +0100
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 13:10:44 +0100, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <l4l7e39r1m1m4027so9i272p7bcr7opq9b@xxxxxxx>, Peter Duncanson
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On 9 Sep 2007 10:39:37 GMT, greymaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Which one?
On 2007-09-08, Elaine Jones <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting from message <rk36e39572iu5j65nsssqasoh0c37kpdha@xxxxxxx>
posted on 8 Sep 2007 by Peter Duncanson
I would like to add:
Yup, "They" don't call it "playing god" when the medics prevent
natural abortion or extend longevity by counteracting effects of a
stroke, cardiac episode etc. but do so in the matter of euthanasia.
Good point.
Take it further - if a species becomes too numerous for its habititat
to support then the species declines.
It's nature - why should homo sapiens be a special case?
Oh, don't you know?.. We are made in God's image :).
Is God still alive? :-)
The one who created this universe. There may be gazillions
of Gods who are subject to evolutionary processes. Ours may
have been a member of a now extinct strain.
--
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in uk.business.agriculture)
.
- References:
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: buddenbrooks
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: greymaus
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Jill
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: greymaus
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Jill
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: greymaus
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Elaine Jones
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Peter Duncanson
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Elaine Jones
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: greymaus
- Re: The new Clearances?
- From: Peter Duncanson
- Re: The new Clearances?
- Prev by Date: Re: The new Clearances?
- Next by Date: Re: The new Clearances?
- Previous by thread: Re: The new Clearances?
- Next by thread: Re: The new Clearances?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|