Re: House of Commons Report
- From: "Jim Webster" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:16:22 +0100
<srawlings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:-NWdnZEyh4UhVZHbRVnytgA@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <5722gtF2bfdlrU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jim Webster) wrote:
Interestingly only Bach and Whitty gave evidence, nowt from the
Caravanner AFAICS. Not her problem??
might start being her problem now ;-))
I note that the NFU/CLA have not called for her resignation, but it
would be hard to do so. However, heads should roll after a report like
that.
I also noted that the UN had been distinctly slow in supporting us. Given
how UK governments have played the UN in the past, it looks as if she is
showing the same competence in her new role as she did in her last
Jim Webster
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: House of Commons Report
- From: Peter Duncanson
- Re: House of Commons Report
- References:
- Re: House of Commons Report
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: House of Commons Report
- From: srawlings
- Re: House of Commons Report
- Prev by Date: Re: Poultry
- Next by Date: Re: House of Commons Report
- Previous by thread: Re: House of Commons Report
- Next by thread: Re: House of Commons Report
- Index(es):