Re: Heath fires
- From: Oz <Oz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:00:33 +0100
Jim Webster <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
"Oz" <Oz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
I expect the operator alone needs to be paid 20/hr, then the machine on
top is going to get to $$$$$ rather fast.
Particularly with a few 100,000 Ha of cumbria to do....
and remember this is an area where the rock pokes through the surface, the
slopes are steep, and access is best described as interesting ;-)
Indeed. I assume that's included in the 1Ha/day (which isn't very much).
I imagine a cost of about 1000/week (5Ha) so 50,000 Ha would cost some
50M. I'm sure the national parks have this sort of dosh to hand out...
--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Heath fires
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Heath fires
- References:
- Heath fires
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Heath fires
- From: greymaus
- Re: Heath fires
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Heath fires
- From: greymaus
- Re: Heath fires
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Heath fires
- From: Edward
- Re: Heath fires
- From: Oz
- Re: Heath fires
- From: Jim Webster
- Heath fires
- Prev by Date: Re: Heath fires
- Next by Date: Re: Harvest?
- Previous by thread: Re: Heath fires
- Next by thread: Re: Heath fires
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|