Re: physics for ex-farmers
- From: Oz <Oz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 14:08:19 +0100
Oh No <notI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Certainly I am expected classical positions. It's a matter of whether
Doppler shows anything non-classical. Cassini, for example, did not
pick
up anything in measurements of bending of light around the sun. The
measurements were so precise that an anomalous Doppler shift should
have
shown.
I haven't come across this one.
Can you give a simple experimental setup and results?
But if the inner solar system defines classical reference frame,
there should be no anomalous Doppler, so that actually makes sense too.
No, I don't like this. You are picking and choosing which is BAD.
As far as I can see you are predicting an effect of an expansion in time
for the light moving from emitter to observer. This expansion is not
currently modelled.
--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: physics for ex-farmers
- From: Oh No
- Re: physics for ex-farmers
- References:
- physics for ex-farmers
- From: Oh No
- Re: physics for ex-farmers
- From: Oz
- Re: physics for ex-farmers
- From: Oh No
- physics for ex-farmers
- Prev by Date: Re: weather
- Next by Date: Re: weather
- Previous by thread: Re: physics for ex-farmers
- Next by thread: Re: physics for ex-farmers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|