Re: email contacts
- From: "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:13:52 +0100
"Jane Gillett" <j.gillett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4e3d769c9bj.gillett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <4ga11dF1lm4nbU6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,bypassed
Jim Webster <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is what interests me, the 'younger' generation seems to have
youemail with text, which is cheaper, faster and more flexible, provided
thatdon't want to send much information.
Will they move to email with any enthusiasm or will it be a work tool,
house,they don't use for home?
I'm trying to see the need for it. Even my sister will communicate with
family through text rather than email, she just puts her hand into her
pocket for the phone, for email she has to go into one room in the
issit down, switch the machine on etc, and be assured that the recipient
forgoing to do the same.
Broadband allows for big downloads but how many people need broadband
private emails?
I just peer into the murk and ponder the future ;-)
You mean the goldfish bowl?
metaphorically yes, but the gold fish is presumed to have teeth
--
--
Jim Webster.
Pat Gardiner, now in the sixth year of raving about bent vets and still no
result
.
- References:
- email contacts
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: email contacts
- From: Howard Neil
- Re: email contacts
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: email contacts
- From: Jane Gillett
- email contacts
- Prev by Date: Re: email contacts
- Next by Date: Re: email contacts
- Previous by thread: Re: email contacts
- Next by thread: Re: email contacts
- Index(es):