Re: I've cracked the lens..

Oh No <notI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
There is also a

sin in the formula for luminosity distance in the curved space model. I

have become suspicious that it should be sin4. I tried the data fits,
for the supernova curves, and sure enough chi^2 does get reduced by a
few pips, and the teleconnection curve now lies bang on top of the
standard one. The standard curve does still have the lowest chi^2, for
both the Riess and Astier data, but now there is hardly any
disagreement
between the values of Omega for the teleconnection fits. 1.035 and
1.075

Only trouble is, I am not quite sure where the sin comes from, or
whether the factor should be 2 or 4, or even something else. I just
threw in a 4 ad hoc.

Sin of what and where. Some more info would be helpful.

--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.



.

Loading