Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Peter Duncanson <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:50:57 +0100
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:29:42 +0100, "Jim Webster"
<Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Derry Argue" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4941rkFm78qpU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:4931drFmfeb1U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
for
A slight twitching of the corner of the upper lip seems to do the trick
these days. You know the rest.<g> Radio 4's Farming Today is soliciting
comments on the SFP. Tempting, isn't it?someone ought to ask the government how they expect to run an ID card scheme
when they cannot even get SFP right
Superficially an ID card scheme is much simpler than SFP: one person,
one card. With SFP there are all sorts of things involved.
It's an illusion of course.
--
Peter Duncanson
UK (posting from ukba)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Derry Argue
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: greymaus
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- References:
- Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Derry Argue
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: "David G. Bell"
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Derry Argue
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Derry Argue
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Derry Argue
- Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- From: Jim Webster
- Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- Prev by Date: Re: sugar beet machinery
- Next by Date: Re: Metronet/Plusnet alternatives
- Previous by thread: Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- Next by thread: Re: Insurance: Private vs. Commercial
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|