Re: Gas guzzling 4x4s. Re: car tax increases
- From: "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:51:32 +0100
"AJH" <sylva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0naj22p62t34cutjr89ic83v6c5ivm4k5j@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:56:02 +0100, "Jim Webster"
<Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. He means that when you crush the plant to extract the oil you get
fibrous plant residues left over. He's right of course, and various
regulations limit what you can do with it if it's been grown on set
aside land.
yes, there will be far more weight of plant matter than there is oil
--
What is the meaning of "setaside" in this context with the move to
sfp?
the set aside rules are complex, made even more complex by the bizarre
system we have adopted in England, which means that I now have neighbours
who last year had to 'set aside' grassland!
I'm sure you really don't want to know the details of how the system works
;-(
--
Jim Webster.
Pat Gardiner, Five years raving about bent vets and still no result
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gas guzzling 4x4s. Re: car tax increases
- From: greymaus
- Re: Gas guzzling 4x4s. Re: car tax increases
- Prev by Date: Re: Scientists say new techniques should be assessed first.
- Next by Date: Re: OT but might ring a few bells
- Previous by thread: Canada - PMWS - latest
- Next by thread: Re: Gas guzzling 4x4s. Re: car tax increases
- Index(es):