Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- From: "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:07:58 -0000
"Malcolm" <Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nsB49tEdq03DFwI3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In article <drnfij$6ba$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pat
> Gardiner <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> >Pat's Note: I'm incandescent with rage.
> >
> Better watch your blood pressure, then.
>
> >Maff-Defra imposes what seem perfectly sensible regulations to register
> >poultry in case of need in the event of bird flu.
> >
> >For some reason they exempt flocks with less than 50 birds.
> >
> Yes, because of the difficulty of discovering them all.
yes, they haven't a clue who they are or where they are. They have been
trying to contact them through various associations and clubs. The big
problem has been the budget, there is no way they could get a budget for
putting the sort of adverts they run in Farmers Guardian in papers like the
Mail or Express, each advert would cost them an order of magnitude more, at
least.
--
Jim Webster.
Pat Gardiner, Five years raving about bent vets and still no result
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- From: Jill
- Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- References:
- Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- Next by Date: Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- Next by thread: Re: Hobby farmers pose bird flu risk ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
