Re: Lambing
- From: "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:24:35 -0000
"Howard Neil" <hneil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43d4109e$0$2679$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim Webster wrote:
>
> > Matt scanned at about 200% (which is different from lambing obviously).
His
> > younger brother bought ten good big mule shearlings and one of them has
> > scanned with quads!
>
> Wow. That will be interesting, not to say potentially problematical.
> Please let us know how she gets on.
we all await that one with interest, the common assumption is that not all
will survive
--
Jim Webster.
Pat Gardiner, Five years raving about bent vets and still no result
.
- References:
- Lambing
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Lambing
- From: Howard Neil
- Re: Lambing
- From: Edward
- Re: Lambing
- From: Howard Neil
- Re: Lambing
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Lambing
- From: Howard Neil
- Lambing
- Prev by Date: Re: Tags - any alternative at all, anywhere?
- Next by Date: Re: So what exactly do scientists know about global warming?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lambing
- Next by thread: Re: Lambing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|