Re: National fallen stock scheme
- From: "Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
"Tim Jones" <wildenfarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43bce53d.71543625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:25:31 -0000, "Jim Webster"
> <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"keith" <keith.williams44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:dph5m7$rvl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:dpgv1b$qa0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > I notice that the company running it has been rather blowing their own
>>> > trumpet about how well they have been doing.
>>> > How is it actually working out on the ground, round here the Knacker
>>> > companies have been absolutely rushed off their feet, indeed they have
>>> been
>>> > losing staff because the hours were getting silly
>>> > --
>>> >
>>>
>>> Luckily the local hunt still picks up here.
>>>
>>
>>amazing the number of people who say that, is there anyone out there on
>>the
>>scheme who is happy with it!!
>
> We've just joined the scheme and are as happy as we could be over
> having to pay for disposal. Our local kanckers are excellent and
> colloct very promptly for a little bit more than we have to pay
> todeliver to the hunt. The savings at the hunt cover the fuel costs,
> but remaining few pennies are a poor return on the time it takes..
> Even without the legal reuirement not to bury, I had reached the
> conclusion that the best answer was an on farm incinerator as its good
> for bio-security, the most time-efficient solutuion and on an all
> grass farm I really don't want to be disturbing the sward every time
> something dies. My idea was to build my own waste oil incinerator
> until the hint of a change in incinerator regs put the project on the
> backburner, I must have another look at it again if the regs are now
> finalised.
>
>
> I sort of feel I should apologise for being upbeat, I seem to be
> offending most newsgroups and mail lists i read with my positive
> outlook and failure to be grumpy enough right now! With our wedding
> on Saturday and a daughter due in March I've just lost my ability to
> bitch on about things. Although having bought the rings the other day
> the current price of gold was a bit of a shock to the system ;)
Congratulations, in advance.
Incinerators for fallen stock are subject to up to four SVS inspections a
year!
Not so good for biosecurity, but good for the SVS collective ego, and job
creation for bent vets.
The NPA has been complaining to Defra - check their site.
http://www.npa-uk.net/
Incinerator Checks
An unreasonable bureaucratic burden is being imposed by the State Veterinary
Service on incinerator users in some areas, including Lincolnshire and
Bedfordshire.
Some users of Defra type-approved low-capacity incinerators have been told
by their local State Veterinary Service office they will be inspected every
three months.
etc. etc.
I suppose you could invite a few SVS to the wedding and hope for
preferential treatment.
--
Regards
Pat Gardiner
www.go-self-sufficient.com
>
> Regards
>
> Tim Jones
.
- References:
- National fallen stock scheme
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: National fallen stock scheme
- From: keith
- Re: National fallen stock scheme
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: National fallen stock scheme
- From: Tim Jones
- National fallen stock scheme
- Prev by Date: Re: The dash for Gas
- Next by Date: AN prices
- Previous by thread: congrats Re: National fallen stock scheme
- Next by thread: Re: National fallen stock scheme
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|