Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:03:32 -0000
"Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dmv2kq$5p6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > so actually there is not story
>
> No I decided that I prefered reading the Times, stopping the dog savaging
> the youngest grandchild and generally putting my feet up.
A bit irresponsible from someone who claims they can bring down the
government. Or perhaps you cannot bring down the government, I confess I
have got lost with your contradictory claims
>
> When I am ready, I will take full advantage of your permission to post
here.
No, I recommended you post here. If you post something considered libellous
on your website, you could lose your website very rapidly.
> > but please decide whether you can bring the government down or not like
> > you
> > said you could
>
> No, I don't think I can
then why did you make the claim?
Jim Webster
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- References:
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Steve Firth
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Jill
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: madbadbirdwoman
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Pat Gardiner
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Prev by Date: Re: Sheep trade
- Next by Date: Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Previous by thread: Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Next by thread: Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|