Re: Hydro or Wind Power


"Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dmva56$o8v$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dmv8k1$t0s$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:dmv2kq$5p6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >> > so actually there is not story
> >>
> >> No I decided that I prefered reading the Times, stopping the dog
savaging
> >> the youngest grandchild and generally putting my feet up.
> >
> > A bit irresponsible from someone who claims they can bring down the
> > government. Or perhaps you cannot bring down the government, I confess I
> > have got lost with your contradictory claims
> >
> >>
> >> When I am ready, I will take full advantage of your permission to post
> > here.
> >
> > No, I recommended you post here. If you post something considered
> > libellous
> > on your website, you could lose your website very rapidly.
>
> How thoughtful!

Well I'd hate the worlds media to lose their chance of a scoop of
unthinkable magnitude.

> >
> >
> >> > but please decide whether you can bring the government down or not
like
> >> > you
> >> > said you could
> >>
> >> No, I don't think I can
> >
> > then why did you make the claim?
>
> Your snipping gets worse. What you have failed to realise is that
>
> 1. Everyone by now knows that excessive snipping means that you are
worried
> about something. You don't do it when relaxed. Although how you manage
> relaxation is beyond me...

no. Everyone on the usenet, but apparently you, realises that unless people
have the courtesy to snip, the posts get overly complicated and unmanageably
large. As everything said remains on the thread and can be read just by
scrolling up or down, the only reason not to snip is that you are either
ignorant, or merely don't actually care whether people are reading or not


>
> 2. That realisation inspires curiosity. One day, I will tell you just how
I
> know that you have so many heavyweight lurkers. Fame at last Jim. I
suspect
> the madbadbird does know and I suspect that if you leant on her, she
might
> tell you.
>
> Anyway...shush...lets watch the techno boys in action....

no, let us post this information you have been promising us for some days,
and claimed we were too cowardly to ask for, but suddenly you seem less than
keen on producing it.

But then that figures


>
> I've been decent - I did tell you that you were not named in the NoW this
> week. OK I admit that was after you had bought it and checked between the
> boobs. But I do have to have some fun sometime....
>

what are you talking about. I have never read the news of the world. We don'
t get it delivered, and as I haven't been into a news agent for some weeks
am unlikely to impulse buy

So what we see is more of your invention. This is the same sort of invention
that claimed that I cancelled my own posts, a claim you made on no evidence
whatsoever.

Jim Webster


.