Re: Metronet-bad news
- From: dbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("David G. Bell")
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:04:58 +0000 (GMT)
On Tuesday, in article
<MTq8MZEsIBjDFw$g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Oz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Oz" wrote:
> sarah <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> >Also, Demon (and some of their staff and customers) have been
> >around for a very long time; they know where a lot of bodies are buried,
> >and can guess how many of the stinking maggot-ridden remains were
> >concealed by BT.
>
> Trouble is thht demon's cheapest is 20/mth.
And, while many of Sarah's comments still hold, I felt quality of the
"official" support had become no better than anyone else's. So I moved
to a cheaper service. Demon just didn't feel special any more.
On the other hand, some aspects of Demon are still significantly better,
if you need those features.
--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.
"I am Number Two," said Penfold. "You are Number Six."
.
- References:
- Metronet-bad news
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Metronet-bad news
- From: Jill.
- Re: Metronet-bad news
- From: sarah
- Re: Metronet-bad news
- From: Oz
- Metronet-bad news
- Prev by Date: Re: Metronet-bad news
- Next by Date: Re: New threads!
- Previous by thread: Re: Metronet-bad news
- Next by thread: Re: Metronet-bad news
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|