Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Oz <Oz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:38:55 +0000
Tim Lamb <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>
>Less the EA charges for abstraction and discharge:-(
I doubt very much these would be significant, possibly zero.
--
Oz
This post is worth absolutely nothing and is probably fallacious.
Use oz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ozacoohdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx functions].
BTOPENWORLD address has ceased. DEMON address has ceased.
.
- References:
- Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Giles
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Oz
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: David Hartley
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Oz
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: sarah
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: sarah
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Old Codger
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Oz
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Tim Lamb
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Oz
- Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- From: Tim Lamb
- Hydro or Wind Power
- Prev by Date: Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Next by Date: Re: Bird flu bites Tesco?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Next by thread: Re: Hydro or Wind Power
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading