Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: "Hamish" <akc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:52:10 -0000
"Tim Lamb" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0imqU5BICjZDFwLk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In message <4365fcc7$0$49779$ed2e19e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>
>>I don't know enough about contract law to advise re the storage.
>>
The following seems to be fairly standard:
7. (ii) In the event of failure by the Customer to pay any amount due to the
Company or to remove any of the Goods from the custody or control of the
Company (notice in accordance with Condition 7(i) having been given) at the
due time, the Company may, without prejudice to its other rights and
remedies against the Customer, give notice in writing to the Customer of the
Company's intention to sell or otherwise dispose of the Goods at the
Customer s entire risk and expense if such amount is not paid and/or such
Goods are not removed within 28 days, or in the case of perishable goods
within 3 days from the date of such notice. On the expiry of such period, if
such payment has not been made and/or the Goods have not been so removed the
Company shall be entitled to sell or otherwise dispose of all or any part of
the Goods at the Customer's entire risk and expense by the best method
reasonably available, and the proceeds of any sale or disposal shall be
remitted to the Customer after deduction therefrom of all expenses and all
amounts due to the Company from the Customer on any account.
That is from a storage facility. I note that the garage have a similar
clause in their standard displayed on the wall terms and conditions that
they can sell the vehicle if the owner does not pay for the work carried
out.
Another thought other than theft occurs to me. If a company is going bust it
may wish to hide its assets from the receivers,
you could end up upsetting customs and excise, much worse than annoying a
local community officer.
.
- References:
- BT Wayleaves
- From: Tim Lamb
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Mike
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Hamish
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Mike
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Hamish
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Howard Neil
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Tim Lamb
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Howard Neil
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Tim Lamb
- BT Wayleaves
- Prev by Date: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Next by Date: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Previous by thread: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Next by thread: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|