Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: "Hamish" <akc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:10:57 -0000
"Old Codger" <oldcodger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4365532f$0$15075$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Howard Neil wrote:
..
>
> How did you manage to see Hamish's post when I didn't? We are both
> reading through Plusnet.
>
> Hasn't shown up on RFN either.
>
> --
Actully after posting it I decided it did not read well so cancelled it
with a view to writing it again later.
Clearly Howard has the "Do not surpress evidence" flag set on his account.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Howard Neil
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- References:
- BT Wayleaves
- From: Tim Lamb
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Mike
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Hamish
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Mike
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Hamish
- Re: BT Wayleaves
- From: Howard Neil
- BT Wayleaves
- Prev by Date: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Next by Date: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Previous by thread: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Next by thread: Re: BT Wayleaves
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|