Re: The Genetics of the British


"Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dcncnp$4bb$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Jim Webster" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dcn4gd$lfl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:dcldbf$egk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >> I knew from past exchanges that your knowledge of insurance was
somewhat
> >> sketchy, so I indicated the possible implications.
> >>
> >> "you are the one who claims to be capable of earning big money and
having
> >> founding umpteen businesses."
> >>
> >> Leaving aside your rather loose English.
> >>
> >> You are making wild and untrue allegations yet again.
> >
> > so it wasn't you who wrote the following?
> >
> > Pat Gardiner Jul 1, 9:51 pm show options
> >
> > Newsgroups: uk.business.agriculture
> > From: "Pat Gardiner" <patgardi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - Find messages by
this
> > author
> > Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:51:24 +0000 (UTC)
> > Local: Fri, Jul 1 2005 9:51 pm
> > Subject: Re: PMWS - Canada (Part Two)
> > Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original |
> > Report Abuse
> >
> >
> >
> > "Peter Duncanson" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >
> >
> > news:7f8bc1l3c7osqkvdro38no76c6eflu2klc@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:46:54 +0000 (UTC), "Pat Gardiner"
> >> <patgardi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>>My warning was serious. Be careful with libel. You will see Oz, who is
> >>>despite his strange behaviour is a very bright man, go into reverse.
The
> >>>bombshell is yet to hit him.
> >
> >
> >>>But already he is finessing his words, in arrears. A bit late Oz! Your
> >>>assets are at risk.
> >
> >
> >> I am stunned and almost speechless!!
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, there you go, he trades on his reputation as a rich and successful
> > businessman. We are all entitled to take him at his word.
> >
> > Quite seriously, I'm feeling pretty good now, and thinking of going back
> > to
> > full time work.
> >
> >
> > Despite a bad heart, a dodgy lung and a nasty cancer, I'm getting pretty
> > fit. That is a good news story. I need no sympathy.
> >
> >
> > The last couple of years at work, I was earning, from memory, something
in
> > the order of 250K pa.
> >
> >
> > Now, the kind of character assassination that has been going on here
> > damages
> > my reputation. That impacts upon my earning ability...
> >
> >
> > Work it out for yourselves.
> >
> >
> > A successful writ slapped on a big landowner, with a rather nasty taste
> > for
> > defamation, would restore any damage to my reputation nicely. Shipping
> > would
> > collapse in laughter.
> >
> >
> > I imagine that Oz has taken the point.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Pat Gardiner
> > PS I always did tell you that I checked out. You just did not bother to
do
> > the work.
> > Interestingly the despised Americans did.
> >
>
> I'm not quite sure what that was supposed to achieve. Oz did take the
point.
>
> "Slug" is robust language, but does not in my book constitute defamation.
>
> I'm clearly not the form of life so described.
>
> Anyway, read my reply elsewhere and reflect on the wisdom of taking
notice.
>
> I suggest that before making remarks that might be defamatory, check to
see
> how easily they can be disproved from Companies House. You would probably
> not even need to pay. I expect the CLA have an internet account, access
and
> interpretation facilities.
>
> It would be quite normal to make those available to their Cumbrian
Chairman
> when he is being warned against possible legal action.
>
> They might be curious and might be inclined to take you to one side for
some
> good advice, but I would not be unhappy with that situation.
>

wriggle wriggle wriggle

did you post that message or not?

Jim Webster


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kathleens crack addiction
    ... Defamation actions are based upon damage to reputation within the ... Kathleen defames, probably, at least a dozen or so every day. ... Damages are a necessary element of the action, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: Implied Defamation
    ... the act of making untrue statements about another which damages ... his/her reputation. ... Therefore a truth is not defamation! ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Implied Defamation
    ... the act of making untrue statements about another which damages ... his/her reputation. ... Therefore a truth is not defamation! ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: The Genetics of the British
    ... >> "you are the one who claims to be capable of earning big money and having ... > Pat Gardiner Jul 1, ... > Well, there you go, he trades on his reputation as a rich and successful ... but does not in my book constitute defamation. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: CORE - Altering Behaviour of "each do" (default param "item")
    ... "Defamation is false and unprivileged spoken words or written publication, ... about you so far has done more damage to your reputation than you have, ... "What defenses may be available to someone who is sued for defamation? ... There are ordinarily 6 possible defenses available to a defendant who is sued ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)