Re: The Genetics of the British


"Pat Gardiner" <patgardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dcldbf$egk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I knew from past exchanges that your knowledge of insurance was somewhat
> sketchy, so I indicated the possible implications.
>
> "you are the one who claims to be capable of earning big money and having
> founding umpteen businesses."
>
> Leaving aside your rather loose English.
>
> You are making wild and untrue allegations yet again.

so it wasn't you who wrote the following?

Pat Gardiner Jul 1, 9:51 pm show options

Newsgroups: uk.business.agriculture
From: "Pat Gardiner" <patgardi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - Find messages by this
author
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:51:24 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Jul 1 2005 9:51 pm
Subject: Re: PMWS - Canada (Part Two)
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original |
Report Abuse



"Peter Duncanson" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message


news:7f8bc1l3c7osqkvdro38no76c6eflu2klc@xxxxxxxxxx


> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 19:46:54 +0000 (UTC), "Pat Gardiner"
> <patgardi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>My warning was serious. Be careful with libel. You will see Oz, who is
>>despite his strange behaviour is a very bright man, go into reverse. The
>>bombshell is yet to hit him.


>>But already he is finessing his words, in arrears. A bit late Oz! Your
>>assets are at risk.


> I am stunned and almost speechless!!



Well, there you go, he trades on his reputation as a rich and successful
businessman. We are all entitled to take him at his word.

Quite seriously, I'm feeling pretty good now, and thinking of going back to
full time work.


Despite a bad heart, a dodgy lung and a nasty cancer, I'm getting pretty
fit. That is a good news story. I need no sympathy.


The last couple of years at work, I was earning, from memory, something in
the order of 250K pa.


Now, the kind of character assassination that has been going on here damages
my reputation. That impacts upon my earning ability...


Work it out for yourselves.


A successful writ slapped on a big landowner, with a rather nasty taste for
defamation, would restore any damage to my reputation nicely. Shipping would
collapse in laughter.


I imagine that Oz has taken the point.


Regards
Pat Gardiner
PS I always did tell you that I checked out. You just did not bother to do
the work.
Interestingly the despised Americans did.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Genetics of the British
    ... >> "you are the one who claims to be capable of earning big money and having ... > Pat Gardiner Jul 1, ... > Well, there you go, he trades on his reputation as a rich and successful ... but does not in my book constitute defamation. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... If you were really going to do anything about your hurt feeling that you reckon Mr Heenan has defamed you would probably know that his remark wasn't slanderous at all. ... The difference between libel and slander is one that confuses many people that babble about it, especially those that have never done anything about protecting their reputation apart from bluster. ... Once you have decided that your reputation has been soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince a jury that your reputation was ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Kathleens crack addiction
    ... Defamation actions are based upon damage to reputation within the ... Kathleen defames, probably, at least a dozen or so every day. ... Damages are a necessary element of the action, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... The difference between libel and slander is one that confuses many people that babble about it, especially those that have never done anything about protecting their reputation apart from bluster. ... Once you have decided that your reputation has been soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince a jury that your reputation was ... Hagar, has not got an identity that is worth anything, no one knows who you are, no one trusts you. ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: "how to" guide to internet libel and anonymous opponents.
    ... > "Defamation protects reputation, no more. ... Words are defamatory if they ... > tend to reduce the reputation of the claimant in the minds of right ... > reputation cannot be damaged much further, and the amount of damages ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
Loading