Re: flat rate VAT
- From: "Tim" <me@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:58:56 +0100
"Ronald Raygun" wrote"Ronald Raygun" wrote"Tim" wrote:
That reminds me. I'm sure I've seen somewhere, I think
in the context of rabies prevention rules, that one should
not bring any live "animal or bird" into the country. Evidently
they are using a non-standard definition of "animal" which
excludes members of the avian family, since the standard
one would render the addition of "or bird" redundant.
It's clear this was done to ward off certain clever-clogs
who would claim it's not against the rules to bring in a
parrot because *their* definition of "animal" is "mammal"
(confirmed by a dictionary), and hence excludes birds.
So - is is OK to bring in reptiles? Or insects? ...
Evidently. Perhaps they don't carry rabies.
Really? Birds do, but reptiles don't?
That's interesting. Having evolved from dinosaurs, birds are
usually more like reptiles (than like mammals) in most things...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Ronald Raygun
- Re: flat rate VAT
- References:
- flat rate VAT
- From: Onlooker
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: DoobieDoo
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Onlooker
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Ronald Raygun
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Tim
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Ronald Raygun
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Tim
- Re: flat rate VAT
- From: Ronald Raygun
- flat rate VAT
- Prev by Date: Re: Why doesn't HMRC deal with PAYE for us?
- Next by Date: Re: flat rate VAT
- Previous by thread: Re: flat rate VAT
- Next by thread: Re: flat rate VAT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|